Back

0 A reply to The Chronicle of Higher Education 07/23/25 article

Your vote is:
0.00 of 0 votes

In 'Instructors Will Now See AI Throughout a Widely Used Course Software' by Sarah Huddleston gives us a modern use of artificial intelligence being used in Canvas, as well as, Instructure educational platforms.

There seems to be more pros than cons in this AI debate:

Pros

-Teachers will keep their jobs as artificial intelligence will aid them with grading workloads, such as standardizing gradings according to a rubric created by AI.

-Teachers will have posts made by students summarized, which will decrease their workload and minimize any bias or subjective reflections.

-Teachers will have more time to mentor students as artificial intelligence helps minimize time and effort, thus improving student outcomes, as well as, relations.

Cons

-Artificial intelligence may not be perfect, which requires generative AI from the instructor at all times.

My perspective

The teacher should stay within academia to pinpoint student weaknesses and strengths, while customizing guidance or advice along with mentoring success initiatives. The teacher or professor within one-on-one meetings with the student can determine emotions the student is feeling, which is unclear if futuristic technologies can feel yet. The teacher or professor, while mentoring can help solve problems based on how the student is feeling.

A reply to The Chronicle of Higher Education 07/23/25 article